Healthy Families Act Reintroduced in Both Chambers

A bill that would require employers to provide paid sick leave to employees was reintroduced in both the House and Senate on May 12, 2011 by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA). The Healthy Families Act (H.R. 1876, S. 984) would allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 56 hours (seven days) annually. Employees could take this leave to attend to their own or a family member’s illness, or use the paid time off for preventative care such as medical appointments. In addition, the bill provides leave for employees who are the victims of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault. Employers with 15 or more employees would be covered by the law.

Employees would be entitled to avail themselves of sick leave – which begins accruing from the first day of employment under the bill – after 60 days. Paid sick leave would carry over from year to year, but may not exceed 56 hours unless the employer permits additional accrual. The Act would require medical certification if more than three consecutive days are taken off. If an employee leaves his or her job and is rehired within 12 months, that employee would be entitled to the accrued leave already earned and would be entitled to take sick leave immediately.

Employers that already have in place paid time off policies that allow employees to take such leave for illness and other circumstances outlined in the Healthy Families Act would not need to modify their policies or permit additional paid time off.

In a statement, Rep. DeLauro claimed that “simply showing up to work when you are sick, known as ‘presenteeism,’ costs employers a staggering $160 billion a year in lost productivity,” adding, “It is in the best interests of our nation, and especially our families, to ensure American workers have access to paid sick days.”

Similar versions of this legislation have been introduced since 2004, but have failed to advance. The current bill is unlikely to gain much traction.

Photo credit: Stock Shop Photography LLC

Another Bill that Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for Flu is Introduced in House and Senate; Congressional Hearing Takes up Paid Sick Leave Cause

Picture of business woman sneezing, while another woman wearing a surgical mask looks on.As promised, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) have introduced in both chambers of Congress emergency legislation that would provide most employees with up to seven paid sick days to care for themselves or a family member with a contagious illness, including the H1N1 influenza virus. The Pandemic Protection for Workers, Families, and Businesses Act (S. 2790, H.R. 4092) would allow employees to use these sick days to tend to their own flu-like symptoms, obtain a medical diagnosis or preventive treatment, care for a sick child, or care for a child whose school or child care facility has been closed due to the spread of a contagious illness. Part-time employees would also be entitled to paid leave on a pro-rated basis. Employees would have the discretion to decide whether they need to take leave, although the Department of Labor (DOL) could issue a regulation requiring medical certification. In addition, the bill would make it unlawful for an employer to take an adverse action or otherwise discriminate against employees that avail themselves of these leave benefits. If enacted, the terms of this bill would take effect within 15 days, and sunset after two years. Employers that already provide up to seven days of annual paid sick leave would not be required to provide additional benefits.

In a press release, Rep. DeLauro claimed that “[t]he Dodd/DeLauro emergency legislation allows workers to decide when they are too sick to work—and are healthy enough to return to work. Our legislation will provide real worker protections and also ensures that working parents can take paid sick leave if their child is sick and needs care.” 

Earlier this month, Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), chair of the Workforce Protections Subcommittee, introduced similar legislation.  This bill, the Emergency Influenza Containment Act (H.R. 3991) is not as generous as the Dodd/DeLauro legislation, as it would provide up to 5 days of leave to employees to deal with a contagious illness. In addition, employees would be entitled to this leave only if the employer directs or advises the employee to stay home. Employees would not be entitled to paid leave if they decide for themselves to stay home. Another important distinction between Rep. Miller’s bill and the Dodd/DeLauro bill is that Rep. Miller's bill would not provide paid leave for the purpose of caring for a child.

The introduction of the Pandemic Protection for Workers, Families, and Businesses Act coincided with a hearing conducted by the House Education and Labor Committee on H1N1 and sick leave policies. The discussion focused on Rep. Miller’s bill, the Emergency Influenza Containment Act. Members of the Committee and witnesses also discussed the Healthy Families Act (S. 1152, H.R. 2460), a paid sick leave bill introduced earlier this year by Rep. DeLauro and the late Sen. Ted Kennedy. That bill would allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 56 hours (seven days) annually. Employees could take this leave to attend to their own or a family member’s illness, or use the paid time off for preventative care such as doctor’s appointments.

During the hearing, Chairman Miller noted that the current H1N1 pandemic called for this emergency legislation. He also pointed out in his written statement (pdf) that this emergency legislation did not supplant the need for comprehensive paid family leave policies. The ranking Republican, Rep. Kline, raised concerns about the interaction of the Emergency Influenza Containment Act with existing laws, such as the FMLA, as well as its impact on smaller companies. Witnesses at the hearing included Rear Admiral Anne Schuchat, (pdf) Assistant Surgeon General, who discussed the status of vaccine availability and steps the Centers for Disease Control is taking in response to the pandemic. Georges Benjamin, (pdf) executive director of the American Public Health Association, and Debra Ness, (pdf) president of the National Partnership for Women and Families, advocated for passage of paid sick leave legislation. Ms. Ness expressed her opposition to conditioning paid leave on the employer’s discretion.  A. Bruce Clark, (pdf) president of Capital Associated Industries, an employers’ association, spoke about the efforts many employees are already taking to respond to the H1N1 pandemic and raised a concern that federal mandated paid leave “will ultimately threaten overall levels and types of responses employers are engaging in.” He raised particular questions and concerns about how a federal paid sick leave mandate would impact paid time off (PTO) policies. He also was concerned about some of the broad and vague definitions in the Emergency Influenza Containment Act and that the legislation would take effect before regulations were issued.

Given widespread public concern with H1N1, there appears to be momentum for Congress to pass some form of H1N1 paid sick leave legislation. Action in the House may come before the end of the year. Efforts to pass this "emergency" legislation will not likely diminish efforts to pass the Healthy Families Act.

This entry was written by Ilyse Schuman.

Photo credit:  Phil Date Photography

Bill Would Provide Five Paid Sick Days to Employees with H1N1

Picture of businesswoman sneezing while another woman wearing a surgical mask looks onRep. George Miller (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), chair of the Workforce Protections Subcommittee, have introduced a bill that would provide up to five paid days of sick leave per year to employees who are told to miss work on account of a contagious illness. The stated purpose of the Emergency Influenza Containment Act (H.R. 3991) – which applies to employers with 15 or more employees – is to “ensure that American workers are able to follow, without financial harm, the recommendations of their employer and public health authorities to stay home when they have symptoms of a contagious disease that may put co-workers, customers, or the public at risk.” Under the terms of this legislation, which covers both full- and part-time workers, employees would be entitled to this paid leave only if they are sent home or advised to stay home by their employers. Employees who decide to stay home on their own claiming to be sick would not have access to this leave.

Employers that already provide at least 5 days of paid sick leave would be exempt from the provisions of this bill. In addition, employers would be permitted to end the sick leave at any time by informing the employees that they believe the employees are well enough to return to work. Employees would be able to continue on unpaid leave under the Family Medical Leave Act or other existing sick leave policies. Those employees who follow their employer’s direction to stay home because of contagious illness cannot be fired, disciplined or made subject to retaliation for following directions.

The entitlements provided in this bill would go into effect within 15 days after enactment, and sunset after two years. This bill has been referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor. According to a press release, this committee will hold a hearing on this emergency legislation the week of November 16.

Although this bill is considered a temporary measure, there has been a push this session to pass permanent sick leave legislation. The Healthy Families Act (H.R. 2460) introduced in May would allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked up to a maximum of 56 hours (seven days) annually. These provisions are also incorporated in the Balancing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3047), legislation introduced this summer by Rep. Woolsey that integrates a number of previously-introduced work/family balance bills.

Photo credit: Phil Date Photography

Legislative and Regulatory News for the Week of May 17

The following is a summary of the legislative and regulatory news for the week of May 17, 2009:

Discrimination in the Workplace

The Volunteer Firefighter and EMS Personnel Job Protection Act (S. 1025) would prevent employers from firing, discriminating against, or otherwise disciplining volunteer firefighters and other emergency medical personnel for missing work while responding to emergencies or other major disasters.

In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court held in AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen that an employer does not necessarily violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) when it pays pension benefits calculated in part under an accrual rule – applied prior to the PDA’s enactment – that gave less retirement credit for pregnancy than for medical leave generally, and that the employer’s method of calculating benefits was permissible as it was part of a bona fide seniority system.

EFCA

Supporters of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) are pushing forward with a “compromise” bill that may be introduced sometime next month.

Employee Benefits

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) introduced the Paid Vacation Act (H.R. 2564), a bill that would mandate paid vacation time for most employees.

Healthcare/Workplace Safety

Two new bills would impact the health care industry. The Nurse and Health Care Worker Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 2381) would mandate the creation of a safe patient handling and injury prevention standard for direct-care registered nurses and other health care workers. The Nurse Staffing Standards for Patient Safety and Quality Care Act (H.R. 2273) would require that all hospitals develop and implement staffing plans that meet newly established minimum direct care registered nurse-to-patient ratios, and adjust staffing numbers based on patient acuity levels and other considerations.

Meanwhile, the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP Act) (H.R. 2360) would create nationwide health insurance pools for small businesses.

Work/Family Balance

The Healthy Families Act (H.R. 2460, S. 1152), a bill that would require employers to provide paid sick leave to employees, was reintroduced in the House and Senate.
 

Healthy Families Act is Reintroduced

A bill that would require employers to provide paid sick leave to employees was reintroduced in the House of Representatives on Monday by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), and co-sponsored by 101 others. The Healthy Families Act (H.R. 2460) would allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked up to a maximum of 56 hours (seven days) annually. Employees could take this leave to attend to their own or a family member’s illness, or use the paid time off for preventative care such as doctor’s appointments. In addition, the bill provides leave for employees who are the victims of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault. Employers with 15 or more employees would be covered by this legislation.

Employees would be entitled to avail themselves of sick leave – which begins accruing from the first day of employment – after 60 days. Paid sick leave would carry over from year to year, but may not exceed 56 hours unless the employer permits additional accrual. The Act would require medical certification if more than three consecutive days are taken off. If an employee leaves the place of employment and is rehired within 12 months, that employee is entitled to the accrued leave already earned, and would be entitled to take sick leave immediately.

Employers that already have in place paid time off policies that allow employees to take such leave for illness and other circumstances outlined in the Health Families Act would not need to modify their policies or permit additional paid time off.

A similar bill was introduced in 2007 by Rep. DeLauro and Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), but failed to gain sufficient support. This prior legislation lacked the current bill’s leave accrual process, and the provisions permitting domestic violence or assault victims to avail themselves of paid sick leave to seek medical attention or services from a victim services organization or to take part in related legal proceedings.

The current legislation has been referred to the House Committees on Education and Labor, Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration. Sen. Kennedy is expected to reintroduce a companion bill in the Senate later this week.