Appeal Seeks to Invalidate E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule

As reported by Daily Journal of Commerce, business groups have appealed the August 25 decision by a federal district court in Maryland upholding the E-Verify Federal Contractor Rule. As previously discussed, the rule is set to take effect on September 8, 2009. If government officials do not voluntarily postpone the effective date, lawyers for the business groups have indicated that they will ask the courts to do so.  Continue reading at Littler's Global Immigration Counsel blog.

E-Verify Rule Postponed Until September 8, 2009

The federal government has told a Maryland judge that it plans to delay for the fourth time the effective date of a rule requiring certain federal contractors and subcontractors to use the E-Verify program. The rule – which would amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to mandate that specified contractors use the electronic employee verification system for current and prospective hires – was initially issued on November 14, 2008, and was to take effect January 15, 2009. Due in part to a lawsuit challenging the legality of the rule, the implementation date was pushed to February 20, then again to May 21 and June 30. The government has requested a stay of the litigation so that the new administration can review the authority of the rule. Pursuant to this request, the government said it would move the start date of the rule until September 8, 2009. A formal announcement of this delay is expected to be published in the Federal Register.

E-Verify Implementation Date is Postponed for the Second Time

The effective date of the new regulations requiring the use of E-Verify by certain federal contractors has been postponed an additional three months until May 21, 2009.

Fore more information on this announcement, see Littler’s ASAP: Effective Date of Federal Contractor E-Verify Regulation Pushed Back to May 2009 by Jorge R. Lopez, Joshua S. Roffman and Lisa A. Cottle.

New Employment Bills Target Veterans, Older Workers, Unemployed, Uninsured and Undocumented

Not even a full month into the year, the new Congress keeps flooding the docket with employment-related bills. Despite organized labor’s push to introduce union-friendly legislation early in President Obama’s term, and the many civil rights and work/family balance bills expected to be introduced, instead, the recent employment-related bills reflect the current financial crisis and rising unemployment. Providing health care and other assistance to the unemployed appears to have taken precedence over the drive for increased union membership and providing for enhanced employee rights and benefits, at least for now.

Economic Stimulus

On Thursday, the House Ways and Means Committee voted 24 to 13 along party lines in favor of its portion of the $825 billion economic recovery package. The bill (H.R. 598) that seeks to provide tax, health and unemployment relief now will be combined with other measures to form H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which is expected to receive full House consideration this week.   H.R. 598 isn't available for complete publication, but its provisions are discussed in a House Ways and Means fact sheet

A controversial aspect of this bill for employers is the provision of funds for extended COBRA coverage for the unemployed. The bill would provide a 65 percent subsidy for COBRA continuation premiums for up to 12 months for individuals and their families who have been involuntarily laid off between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. The continuation of health care coverage would last as long as 12 months. Those individuals who were terminated but did not elect COBRA coverage within 60 days as required by law would be given an additional 60 days to do so. This bill also extends COBRA coverage for older (at least 55 years old) and tenured (have been with the employer for at least 10 years) workers. These individuals would be able to maintain their COBRA coverage at their own expense until they become eligible for Medicare or are able to secure alternate employment.

Lawmakers who were concerned about the effect of the cost of continued COBRA coverage for employers offered a number of amendments to the bill, all of which were defeated.

Veterans’ Employment Rights

The Servicemembers Access to Justice Act of 2009 (S. 263) would amend title 38 of the U.S. Code to improve enforcement of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA). This bill, among other things, would make agreements to arbitrate a dispute regarding an employee’s USERRA rights unenforceable, except in cases where the agreement is formed after the dispute arises. Moreover, this act would not invalidate the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement. S. 263 would also enhance remedies for USERRA violations. Under this act, an employer found in violation could be liable for both compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney’s fees. In addition, this legislation clarifies that USERRA prohibits wage discrimination against a member of the armed forces, and provides for equitable relief when appropriate.

This bill was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Another bill introduced this month seeks to provide employers with an incentive to hire unemployed veterans. The Veterans Jobs Opportunity Act of 2009 (S. 274) would amend the Internal Revenue Code to provide a tax credit to employers that hire an unemployed veteran in 2009 or 2010. An “unemployed veteran” for the purposes of this bill is defined as a veteran who was discharged or released from active duty in the Armed Forces during 2008, 2009 or 2010, and has been receiving unemployment compensation under state or federal law for at least four weeks during the 1-year period ending on the hiring date. This amendment would apply to those hired after December 31, 2008.

This bill was referred to the Committee on Finance. 

Senior Workers

The Health Care and Training for Older Workers Act (S. 281) would, among other things, extend COBRA continuation coverage for certain older workers, and create employment and training programs for seniors. This bill would amend section 602(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security act of 1974 (ERISA) and section 2202(2)(A) of the Public Health Service Act by inserting a “Special Rule for Certain Older Workers” provision that qualifies an employee for continuing health care coverage if that employee is at least the early retirement age as defined in the Social Security Act, but is not yet entitled to benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act based on age.

This bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Employee Verification

The Employee Verification Amendment Act of 2009 (H.R. 662) would extend the pilot programs for employment eligibility confirmation, and provide funds to the Commissioner of Social Security and the Secretary of Homeland Security to acquire, install and maintain technological equipment and systems for the implementation of an employment verification confirmation system.

This bill was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor and Ways and Means.