Victoria Lipnic Sworn in as EEOC Member

On Tuesday, Victoria Lipnic was sworn in as a member of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), making the five-member Commission complete for the first time in nearly two years. EEOC Chair Jacqueline Berrien and Commissioner Chai Feldblum were sworn in earlier this month, joining current members Stuart Ishimaru and Constance Barker. Lipnic, the Republican nominee to the EEOC, was one of 15 recess appointments President Obama made over the spring legislative recess.

Before her appointment to the EEOC, Lipnic practiced management-side labor and employment law. Prior to entering private practice, Lipnic served as the U.S. Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards from 2002 until 2009, where she oversaw the Employment Standards Administration (ESA). Lipnic has also worked as Workforce Policy Counsel to the Republican members of the House Committee on Education and Labor, and as labor and employment in-house counsel for the U.S. Postal Service. During the Reagan administration, Lipnic served as a special assistant for business liaison to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Malcolm Baldrige.

Obama Names P. David Lopez as His Choice for EEOC General Counsel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sealLast Thursday President Obama announced has his intent to nominate P. David Lopez to serve as general counsel of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). According to a White House press release, Lopez has worked at the EEOC for 13 years both in the field and at the agency’s headquarters. Lopez presently serves as a supervisory trial attorney with the EEOC’s Phoenix District Office. Prior to working for the EEOC, Lopez worked at the Civil Rights Division, Employment Litigation Section, at the U.S. Department of Justice from 1991 to 1994, and was an associate in a private law practice from 1988-1991. Lopez earned his law degree from Harvard Law School in 1988, and his undergraduate degree in Political Science from Arizona State University in 1985, magna cum laude.

Obama Nominates Chai Feldblum as EEOC Commissioner

On Monday President Obama announced his intent to nominate Chai Feldblum to serve as one of the five members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).  Yesterday, her nomination was sent to the Senate for confirmation. Feldblum is currently a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, where she has taught since 1991. According to her faculty bio, Feldblum was instrumental in drafting and negotiating the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. She also helped draft and negotiate the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA) and various medical privacy bills and regulations. In addition, Feldblum is the Director of Georgetown Law Center’s Federal Legislation and Administrative Clinic, and is co-director of Workplace Flexibility 2010, an initiative aimed to advance a national policy on workplace flexibility. Feldblum has written a number of articles and books advocating disability and gay rights, and has on several occasions testified before Congress to promote the ADA Restoration Act of 2007, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, and employment flexibility to benefit older workers, among other workplace issues.

Feldblum earned her undergraduate degree from Barnard College, and her law degree from Harvard Law School. Feldblum has clerked for Judge Frank M. Coffin on the First Circuit Court of Appeals and for Justice Harry A. Blackmun on the U.S. Supreme Court.

If confirmed by the Senate, Feldblum would be the third Democrat to sit on the EEOC panel. Acting Chairman Stuart Ishimaru and Acting Vice Chair Christine Griffin are both Democrats, while Commissioner Constance Barker is currently the lone Republican serving on the Commission. Republican Naomi Earp, who served as EEOC Chair during the Bush Administration, resigned in the Spring. In July, President Obama nominated Democrat Jacqueline Berrien to serve as the new EEOC Chair.  Acting Vice Chair Griffin – who has been confirmed to serve as the deputy director of the Office of Personnel Management – is allowed to remain on the Commission until a successor is approved.

EEOC Updates Compliance Manual to Conform with Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has revised a portion of its Compliance Manual addressing the timeliness of filing pay discrimination claims in light of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which was enacted on January 29 of this year. This law overturned the Supreme Court’s decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 550 U.S. 618 (2007), which required plaintiffs to file a charge of compensation discrimination within 180 days (300 in jurisdictions that have a local or state law prohibiting the same form of pay discrimination) of the discriminatory act or decision. The new law reinstates the “paycheck rule,” which allows courts to consider the receipt of a paycheck or other benefits stemming from the initial discriminatory pay decision to constitute a separate discriminatory act for statute of limitations purposes. The revised Compliance Manual reflects this shift in section 2-IV C.4, Compensation Discrimination, by stating that the period for submitting a claim of pay discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Rehabilitation Act or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) begins when any of the following situations occur:

  • the employer adopts a discriminatory compensation decision or other discriminatory practice affecting compensation;
  • the charging party becomes subject to a discriminatory compensation decision or other discriminatory practice affecting compensation; or
  • the charging party’s compensation is affected by application of a discriminatory compensation decision or other discriminatory practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid, resulting in whole or part from such discriminatory decision or practice.

This section also explains that although these time frames apply to all forms of compensation, including the payment of pension benefits, the Ledbetter Act was not intended to change the method for calculating when pension distributions are considered paid. Therefore, if an individual intends to file a discrimination claim based on pension benefits, the Compliance Manual advises the claimant to file a charge within 180/300 days of retirement, as pension benefits are considered paid “upon entering retirement and not upon issuance of each annuity check.”

This new section provides the following example of an actionable claim:

After working for the Respondent for nearly 10 years as a production supervisor, CP learns she is being paid less than the other four production supervisors in her department, who are all men. Immediately after learning about the pay discrepancy, CP files an EEOC charge alleging sex-based wage discrimination in violation of Title VII. The investigation shows that CP generally received lower pay raises than her male counterparts as the result of lower performance ratings, which CP alleges to have been discriminatory. Although these performance ratings and related pay raises all occurred more than 300 days before CP filed her charge, they affected her pay within the filing period. Therefore, CP’s pay discrimination charge is timely.

The Ledbetter Act is retroactive to May 28, 2007, and applies to all claims of compensation discrimination pending on or after that date.
 

Obama Names Jacqueline A. Berrien as His Pick to Head the EEOC

President Obama has announced his intent to nominate Jacqueline Berrien as Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Berrien currently serves as Associate Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF). According to the White House press release on her nomination, Berrien worked as a Program Officer in the Ford Foundation’s Peace and Social Justice Program from 2001 to 2004. Before that, Berrien was an assistant counsel with LDF and directed the Fund’s voting rights and political participation work. According to biographical information provided by the NAACP, as assistant counsel Berrien represented African-American voters in proceedings before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals and the U.S. District Courts. Prior to working for the LDF, Berriern was a staff attorney with the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union. Additionally, Berrien has taught in trial advocacy programs at Fordham and Harvard law schools and served on the adjunct faculty of New York Law School. After graduating law school, Berrien clerked for the Honorable U.W. Clemon, the first African-American appointed to the U.S. District Court in Birmingham, Alabama.

Berrien earned her law degree from Harvard Law School, where she served as a General Editor of the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, and received her undergraduate degree from Oberlin College.

EEOC Votes to Update ADA Regulations in Response to ADA Amendments Act

In a public meeting held Wednesday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted 2-1 to revise its Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations to conform with changes to the law made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA). The proposed revisions will now be forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review before they can be formally published in the Federal Register.

The ADAAA – which was enacted in response to a number of U.S. Supreme Court cases that narrowly interpreted who could be considered “disabled” under the ADA – significantly expands the scope of this definition, and thus who may now bring suit under the ADA. Acting EEOC Vice Chair Christine M. Griffin stated in a press release:

These regulations will serve to shift the focus of the courts from further narrowing the definition of disability and putting it back to where Congress intended when the ADA was enacted in 1990. Courts should now focus on whether discrimination based on disability is occurring in the workplace. The protections afforded by the ADA AA and these new regulations are important for all workers including our returning wounded warriors who certainly deserve the right to re-enter a workforce free of discrimination.

During the public meeting, EEOC assistant legal counsel Christopher Kuczynski described the key ADA terms that would be affected by the proposed rule changes. A full copy of his statement can be found here. Of particular interest, the proposed rules would expand which activities would be considered “major life activities” under the ADA, such as reading, reaching, bending, sitting and communicating, as well as a list of “major bodily functions” such as normal cell growth and reproductive functions. Additionally, the proposed changes would loosen the standard for determining whether a particular impairment “substantially limits” a major life activity. For example, the proposed rules would stipulate that mitigating measures such as medication and prosthetic devices should not be taken into consideration in making this determination. The proposal also adds a list of conditions that would be presumptively considered substantially limiting under the ADA, including autism, cancer, cerebral palsy, diabetes, epilepsy, HIV and AIDS, major depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia. Examples of impairments that may be considered substantially limiting depending on the individual’s circumstances include asthma, high blood pressure, coronary artery disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, among others.

With respect to whether an impairment would substantially limit the major life activity of “working,” the proposed regulations would place the focus on whether the individual is precluded from a “type of work” as opposed to a class or broad range of jobs. This standard of review makes it more likely that an individual would be considered disabled. Additionally, the proposal makes it a point to say that the fact that an individual has found another job would not be dispositive of whether he or she is substantially limited in the ability to work. The proposed changes would also make it easier for an individual to bring an ADA claim based on a “record” of having a disability, or being “regarded as” disabled.

A copy of the proposed rules will be available once they are published in the Federal Register following OPM review.

For more information on the ADAAA, see Littler’s ASAP: Congress Tells the Courts How to Interpret the ADA by Margaret Hart Edwards and Patrick F. Martin.

Legislative and Regulatory News for the Week of May 10

The following is a summary of the legislative and regulatory news for the week of May 10, 2009:

Agency Happenings

Both the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have issued their regulatory agendas for the coming months.

Health Care/Employee Benefits

A number of federal agencies are requesting information on the mental health parity provisions made by the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) in advance of a future rulemaking on group health plans.  Meanwhile, legislation providing employers with various incentives for promoting employee health may receive serious consideration now that Congress is contemplating major healthcare reform.

Immigration

The Department of Homeland Security has issued a fact sheet discussing its revised Worksite Enforcement Strategy, which will increase efforts to target employers in violation of immigration law.

Work/Family Balance

The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor has issued an opinion letter clarifying that an employer’s internal notification policy regarding employee attendance can be enforced against an employee attempting to take leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) so long as compliance with the notice policy is practicable given the employee’s particular circumstances.

Legislative and Regulatory News for the Week of April 19

The following is a summary of the legislative and regulatory news for the week of April 19, 2009:

Discrimination in the Workplace

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a technical assistance document on caregiving responsibilities.

EFCA

Andy Stern, head of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) has acknowledged problems in passing the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA).

Employee Benefits

The Conflicted Investment Advice Prohibition Act of 2009 (H.R. 1988) would amend ERISA regarding the provision of independent investment advice.

Immigration

The New Employee Verification Act of 2009 (H.R. 2028) would replace E-Verify. Meanwhile, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that the H-1B cap has still not been reached.

Labor/Management Relations

The Patriot Employers Act (S. 829) was reintroduced. This bill would provide a tax credit to employers that create and maintain domestic jobs with specific pay and benefits and maintain neutrality toward union organizing efforts.

The Green Jobs Improvement Act (H.R. 2026) would amend the Workforce Investment Act to make non-union training programs eligible for federal funding under the “Green Jobs” program.
 

Legislative and Regulatory News for the Week of April 12

The following is a summary of the legislative and regulatory news for the week of April 12, 2009:

Agency Changes

President Obama plans to nominate Lorelei Boylan to serve as Administrator of the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division. Obama also announced his intent to nominate Thomasina Rogers for Chair of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Discrimination in the Workplace

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) plans to hold a public meeting to discuss discrimination against employees with caregiving responsibilities.

Immigration

The U.S. Department of Defense announced that the effective date of the Federal Contractor E-Verify Rule will be delayed until June 30, 2009.

EEOC to Hold Public Meeting on Caregiver Discrimination

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, April 22 to discuss discrimination against employees with caregiving responsibilities. At this meeting, the agency will release a new document, Employer Best Practices for Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities. This document will supplement formal guidance the EEOC issued on this topic in 2007.

The meeting will be held at the EEOC’s Washington, D.C. headquarters at 131 M Street, N.E. at 10 a.m. (Eastern Time). The scheduled panelists include: Cynthia Calvert, Deputy Director, The Center for WorkLife Law; Karen Minatelli, Director of Work and Family Programs, National Partnership for Women and Families; Heather Boushey, Senior Economist, Center for American Progress; and Jeff Norris, President, Equal Employment Advisory Council.
 

Mandatory Health Risk Assessments Could Violate the ADA

In an informal discussion letter dated March 6, 2009, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has determined that requiring employees to take health risk assessments in order to obtain health insurance coverage would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  According to EEOC Associate Legal Counsel Peggy R. Mastroianni, such a mandatory health assessment would violate the ADA’s provisions requiring disability-related inquiries and medical examinations to be job-related and consistent with business necessity.

The official inquiry concerned a county that had implemented a clinical health risk assessment (CHRA) as a requirement to obtain health insurance coverage under a self-funded plan. Employees were required to participate in the CHRA, which included answering a short health-related questionnaire, taking a blood pressure test, and providing blood for use in a blood panel screen. Those who declined to participate were rendered ineligible for coverage under the county’s plan. In response to this inquiry, the EEOC acknowledged that it has not taken a formal position on the issue. However, it determined that requiring all employees to take this health risk assessment that includes disability-related inquiries and medical examinations as a prerequisite for obtaining health insurance coverage does not appear to be job-related and consistent with business necessity, and therefore would violate the ADA.

The response also touched upon the legality of such disability-related inquiries and medical examinations as part of a voluntary wellness program. Such a program is voluntary, Mastroianni writes, if employees are neither required to participate nor are penalized for nonparticipation. In this particular instance, the EEOC advised that even if the health risk assessment could be considered part of a wellness program, the program would not be voluntary, as those declining to participate would be denied coverage.

A portion of the EEOC’s initial response to this inquiry (dated January 6, 2009) was officially rescinded in the follow-up discussion letter. The original response described the circumstances under which employers could offer employees inducements to participate in wellness programs without running afoul of the ADA. The EEOC responded that a wellness program would be voluntary and any disability-related inquiries or medical exams conducted in connection with the program would not violate the ADA if the inducement to participate in the program did not exceed twenty percent of the cost of employee-only or employee and dependent coverage under the plan, consistent with regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). The portion regarding what level of inducement in a wellness program would trigger ADA compliance problems was officially rescinded, as the inquiry did not specifically ask this question, and the EEOC noted that it is still examining what, if any, financial inducement to participate in a wellness program is permissible under the ADA.
 

USCCR Reopens Comment Period Over Workplace English-Only Rules

The United States Commission on Civil Rights (USCCR) has re-opened the period for public comment on English-only policies in the workplace. On December 12, 2008, the USCCR held a briefing on this issue. A transcript of that briefing is available at the USCCR’s website.  Written statements of invited panelists and a link to the C-SPAN broadcast can also be found at the agency’s site.  (click on the heading: Commission Extends Comment Period on English in the Workplace Briefing until April 20, 2009).

According to the USCCR, the goal of the briefing was to examine whether employers have the legal authority to specify English as the official language of the workplace. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has taken the position that English-only policies risk national origin discrimination – a position that was heavily criticized by business interests during the Dec. 12 briefing.

Comments on English-only policies will be accepted until April 20, 2009.  Such comments may be sent by mail to: English in the Workplace Comments, US Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20425, or via e-mail to comments@usccr.gov.

ADA Amendments Act Regulations Not Approved

When the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) goes into effect January 1, 2009, regulations interpreting this new law will not be forthcoming. On December 11, the EEOC failed to approve a notice of proposed rulemaking on this new act, which overturns a number of U.S. Supreme Court cases that narrowly interpreted the scope of the ADA’s coverage

The four commissioners deadlocked along party lines on whether to approve Republican Chair Naomi Earp’s proposed regulations, which then would have been subject to a 60-day comment period after OMB review and publication in the Federal Register. Reportedly, the sticking point for the Democratic commissioners was that a public meeting on the content of the proposed regulations was premature, as they were not yet finished. Drafts of the regulations have been in the making since August.

Since a transcript of the EEOC meeting is not yet available, the details of the draft regulations are unknown. Thus, it is still unclear as to whether the regulations are objectionable on substantive grounds or just incomplete. What is certain is that regulations or other interpretive guidance on the ADAAA will not be enacted until the next administration, when two new EEOC commissioners will be in place. Since it is anticipated that those vacancies will be filled by employee advocates, the next set of regulations will be more likely to appease the disability rights groups who objected to swift approval of the current version of the act.