Draft Immigration Proposal Calls for Biometric Employment Verification, Increased Penalties Against Labor Law Violators
A 26-page outline (pdf) of a new proposed immigration overhaul bill would require all employers to use a newly-created Biometric Enrollment, Locally-stored Information, and Electronic Verification of Employment (BELIEVE) System as a means of verifying employee work authorization. Within 18 months of the proposed bill’s enactment, the Social Security Administration (SSA) would be required to issue biometric social security cards, which within five years would serve as the only acceptable document employers could use for employment verification purposes. The proposal also calls for a 300 percent increase in monetary fines against employers that knowingly hire illegal workers, and enhanced civil and criminal penalties against employers that engage in egregious labor violations involving unauthorized workers.
Buried in the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (
During a recent
Service Employees International Union’s (SEIU) secretary-treasurer, Anna Burger, has withdrawn her candidacy for union president, all but ensuring that
The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) does not authorize arbitrators to impose class arbitration on parties to a dispute when the arbitration agreement itself is silent on the matter. In
On Wednesday, the House Workforce Protections Subcommittee held a
According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) semiannual regulatory agenda, final rules on Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and the employment provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) are imminent. The EEOC
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has released the final version of its
On Monday, the Department of Labor (DOL) published in the Federal Register its
Legislation introduced in both the House and Senate would impose new record-keeping requirements on employers that hire independent contractors, and impose stricter penalties for misclassification. Introduced by Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH), the Employee Misclassification Prevention Act (
The Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has issued a
On Thursday, the House Committee on Education and Labor held a subcommittee
President Obama has issued a
On Tuesday, Victoria Lipnic was
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced the creation of the Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, a new division that will provide “leadership for implementing the provisions of the health reform bill that address private health insurance.” A
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide when employers can be held accountable for company officials who cause or influence the outcome of an adverse employment action, but do not themselves make that decision. The case, Staub v. Proctor Hospital (09-400), will therefore resolve conflicting opinions from several circuit courts of appeal regarding when employers may be held liable for the unlawful motives and actions of an official other than the formal decision maker, often referred to as the “cat’s paw” theory of imputed liability..jpg)
The Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a 
After a two-week legislative recess, the Senate voted 60-34 on Monday to limit debate on the Continuing Extension Act of 2010 (
In tomorrow’s edition of the Federal Register, the Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will publish a
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has made available
The Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has created a
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has set up a
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Office of Legal Counsel recently made available two informal discussion letters addressing how two common and seemingly innocuous hiring practices could, under certain circumstances, inadvertently subject employers to charges of disparate impact discrimination. Although these advisory letters are intended as informal discussions of the specific issues only, they should serve as warnings to employers to double-check their use of credit checks and education degrees as selection criteria.
On Wednesday, President Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama and the White House Council on Women and Girls hosted a